Universal Access To All Knowledge
Home Donate | Store | Blog | FAQ | Jobs | Volunteer Positions | Contact | Bios | Forums | Projects | Terms, Privacy, & Copyright
Search: Advanced Search
Anonymous User (login or join us)
Upload

Reply to this post | See parent post | Go Back
View Post [edit]

Poster: Spuzz Date: Aug 2, 2004 10:32am
Forum: movie_of_the_week Subject: Re: Glenn is a malicious boy, let's drive him out

And besides, based on Glenn's much contributions to HELPING people on other parts of the archive (mainly on etree,) I totally can see he's harmless.and a really nice guy to boot!

Welcome to the forum Glenn, all the rest of us here don't bite :)

This post was modified by Spuzz on 2004-08-02 17:32:01

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: glenn Date: Aug 2, 2004 10:42am
Forum: movie_of_the_week Subject: Re: Glenn is a malicious boy, let's drive him out

What I say on the internet is for everyone to see. You're welcome to disagree with me, but I haven't any malice in me, and I think I'm pretty careful not to hurt feelings or to state my opinion's as fact.

The mere factthatI have replied toone of your posts, if I did, should not make you feel like my comments arepointed atyou, whoeveryou are..(I didn't even bother to see who it was that lashed out at me, as it was obviously someone who misunderstood me or just needs to lash out at someone.

shrug

I don't know where anyone would get the idea that I was attacking them, I just was expressing an opinion about the appropriateness of hosting that particular file.

I think it's obscene to turn on the tv and see a picture of a person's leg with no person attached to it, laying in the dirt.

I don't think a video of a girl in a bra qualifies as obscenity in this community. Meaning a fairly academic and mature level archive attempting to become the modern equivalent of the Library at Alexandria.

...as for 'growing up', I have grown up about as far as I ever will, and in fact seem to be growing back down now. And out around the middle as well.

And I'd like to point out that I don't hide behind a pseudonym, glenn is in fact my full legal name. I think one should be willing to own up to what you say on the net, and think before posting to an archive that will in all likelihood last longer than all of us.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: cashel Date: Aug 2, 2004 11:28am
Forum: movie_of_the_week Subject: Re: Glenn is a malicious boy, let's drive him out

Why did you tell me"You might view this film again and point out what partof this film you might find obscenity"(your actual words) .As I had NEVER expressed moral judgment on this film, I had no cause but to object.. (TRIVIA Seeing girls in bras does NOT disturb me)

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: glenn Date: Aug 2, 2004 10:08pm
Forum: movie_of_the_week Subject: Re: Glenn is a malicious boy, let's drive him out

sorry,that was a misunderstanding, on someone's part, I did say substantilly that,but it was directed at that other guy who did say it.

Maybe I 'replied'by clicking a link at the wrong level of the hierarchy, or maybe you did,or whatever...it doesn't really matter to me, does it matter to you? We could maybe sort it out if it seems important.
I'm more than willing to go with the 'glenn is an ignorant newbie' theory,and move on to something fun or go import the 3 string cheese incident shows I just uploaded.

Hey,have you seen the movie Pipe Dream?. If you have,what did you think of it?

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: cashel Date: Aug 2, 2004 10:27pm
Forum: movie_of_the_week Subject: Re: Glenn now OK thanks

Partly my faulty. I saw the Siggraph movie and still find it fascinating . I am leaving the feature oview Forum. There is too much hassle and waste of time. I have read many of your posts in other forums and have found them intelligent and informative. (at least my time in this forum has polished my debating skills so not entirely wasted

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: ridetheory Date: Aug 2, 2004 11:49pm
Forum: movie_of_the_week Subject: Debating Skills

...at least my time in this forum has polished my debating skills so not entirely wasted...

ROTFL!



Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: glenn Date: Aug 2, 2004 10:46pm
Forum: movie_of_the_week Subject: Re: Glenn now OK thanks

No worries. I'll see you around.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: cashel Date: Aug 2, 2004 11:51am
Forum: movie_of_the_week Subject: Re: Glenn is a malicious boy, let's drive him out

SPUZZ ..just quoting a few of GLEN,s words "You might view this film again and point out what part of this film you might find obscentity" This Glen with MALICE and it is a LIE to suggest that I found obscenity in that film . I only said that it was boring cheap and stupid and made no moral judgement revision spelling

This post was modified by cashel on 2004-08-02 18:51:17

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: summerseve Date: Aug 2, 2004 9:19pm
Forum: movie_of_the_week Subject: Re: Glenn is a malicious boy, let's drive him out

SPUZZ ..just quoting a few of GLEN,s words "You might view this film again and point out what part of this film you might find obscentity" This Glen with MALICE and it is a LIE to suggest that I found obscenity in that film . I only said that it was boring cheap and stupid and made no moral judgement revision spelling

Cashel, please refer back to the title if your post, which labels the film "mind-less smut".
Arguing with you is so easy it's almost unfair.

And Glenn, please ignore the resident troll. Your posts have been interesting and intelligent, and we could certainly use more of that (as you can see)...

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: cashel Date: Aug 2, 2004 9:49pm
Forum: movie_of_the_week Subject: Re: Glenn is a malicious boy, let's drive him out

trafalgar .. your reply is incomprehinsable and your insult is typical of your abiding dislike of me. Icertainly dislike your opinions and have openly stated this on many occassions revision )spelling but have left some to amuse

This post was modified by cashel on 2004-08-03 04:42:00

This post was modified by cashel on 2004-08-03 04:49:51

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: ridetheory Date: Aug 2, 2004 11:59pm
Forum: movie_of_the_week Subject: Contradictions

Cashel,

Trafalgar's post was not incoherent, it was quite succinct and logical.

You called the film smut in your header of your original post. Do you consider smut to be obscene? If not, what is your definition of smut? The OED says smut is "Indecent or obscene language," and dictionary.com says that it is "Obscenity in speech or writing; Pornography." Smut is obscenity, and you called the film smut. Therefore, based on the definition, you called the film obscene.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: summerseve Date: Aug 3, 2004 11:40am
Forum: movie_of_the_week Subject: Re: Glenn is a malicious boy, let's drive him out

Sorry, my "if" should have read "of".
Anyway, the point has already been made: Jack called the film smut. Some people disagree. No big deal.
And really I swear, Jack, I bear you no malice. Sometimes I don't think you're for real...but malice? No.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: ridetheory Date: Aug 2, 2004 3:20pm
Forum: movie_of_the_week Subject: Re: Glenn is a malicious boy, let's drive him out

Okay, you never said that the film is obscene.

But if you don't think it's obscene, why do you want to prevent children from accessing it?

If you also believe, as you said in earlier posts, that a 9-year-old would find it boring, then why are you concerned with setting up a system to keep him from watching it?